Is Definitely An Al Qaeda Armed With Nuclear Weapons The Stuff Of Fiction?

Technologically adept espionage thrillers, particularly those that concentrate on credible threats from Al Qaeda, can at times grab you and never ever let you go. The anxiousness they generate is existential and visceral. They bring back undesirable memories of 9/11. And they reinforce our worry that negative points at times seriously do happen in our flawed globe. Most terrifying of all are novels that mix these two items that we hope will never ever come with each other in real life: Al Qaeda terrorists and atomic bombs.

The basic premise of a recent, timely novel can be a very simple a single: to avenge the death of Osama Bin Laden in May perhaps 2011, Ayman al-Zawahiri, the designated successor Maximum Leader of AQ, orders his minions to search for, discover, and acquire a "suitcase nuke" within the massive and amorphous black armaments markets in the former USSR. Armed with this bomb, Al-Zawahiri will then extrapolate exponentially AQ's energy to do terrible points all over the world.

You can find many different credible scenarios that could possibly be www.ozusedguns.com place forward for the bomb's acquisition, but those that are most compelling of all would rely genuine information anytime achievable. The Russians created an "RA" series of portable tactical nuclear armaments developed for use against NATO in locations like the Fulda Gap. Everyone who does a "wiki" search of RA portable nuclear devices will rapidly see that these bombs exist in reality and had been not part of the imaginings of any novelist.

You'll find such bombs on the planet, and some of them haven't been mothballed.

Surely among the most worrisome concerns associated to Al Qaeda nowadays, more than a decade soon after the 9/11 tragedy in New York, is that the terror consortium will attempt for a spectacular encore, and that the terrible guys will do so by going to good lengths to obtain a nuclear weapon. How would they do that? Where would they go? How much would it expense? Those are the crucial inquiries any espionage novel dealing with this topic would have to answer.

There was a time where the former Soviet Union as well as the United states, in certain, maintained arsenals of nuclear weapons that have been orders of magnitude bigger than they're today. As not too long ago as the Gorbachev/FirstBush era, the USSR promised to repatriate to Moscow some 30,000 nuclear weapons spread all through the USSR client states, nations that quickly became independent just after the fall with the Berlin Wall.

Thirty thousand bombs is usually a lot of bombs. If only 1 per cent of these nukes went "missing" as the old Soviet Union was becoming unglued and high-ranking military males -- generals and in some cases lowly colonels -- had been stockpiling Kalashnikovs, SAMs, along with other options to their evaporating pensions and 401(k) plans, that one per cent would quantity to some 300 nuclear weapons potentially now available on the market for sale for the highest bidder. Some could already be within the wrong hands.

Does anyone truly believe that completely 99 per cent of those 30,000 bombs had been safely dismantled? Certainly the number that had been "lost" is far greater than one per cent. That suggests that there could be far more than 500 "loose nukes" floating regarding the arms bazaars of central Asia. What would such a prize price? Five million dollars? Ten million? Twenty million? What if it had been thirty million? Does everyone doubt a global Al Qaeda organization could raise thirty million dollars? A great deal of Al Qaeda's funding has dried up, but just how much income the organization could still raise can be a query worth pondering.